Initiating bankruptcy proceedings is a significant legal step with financial implications, but what occurs if a higher court later annuls the ‘Decision to initiate bankruptcy proceedings’? A pressing question emerges: Can the advance payment made for bankruptcy costs could reclaim to the petitioner who initially sought to initiate these proceedings? This inquiry delves into a complex aspect of bankruptcy law, exploring the rights and remedies available to those who find themselves in this situation. Understanding the potential for reimbursement is essential, as it encompasses issues of fairness and accountability within the legal system. In this exploration, we will navigate the intricacies and principles governing the refund of bankruptcy costs in cases where the decision is annulled by a higher court.
Question:
In the case where the petitioner requests the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings but only pays the bankruptcy fee without making an advance payment for bankruptcy costs, how should it be resolved?
Answer:
According to the provisions of Article 22 and Article 23 of the Law on Bankruptcy, paying the bankruptcy fee and making an advance payment for bankruptcy costs are obligations of the petitioner (except in cases where they are exempt). Article 39 of the Law on Bankruptcy states: “The People’s Court shall receive the written request for initiation of bankruptcy process on receiving the receipts of the bankruptcy fee and the bankruptcy advance.”
Therefore, submitting the bankruptcy fee, making an advance payment for bankruptcy costs, and providing the receipts for payment of the bankruptcy fee and the advance payment for bankruptcy costs to the Court are two mandatory conditions for the Court to handle the bankruptcy proceedings (Article 39 of the Law on Bankruptcy ).
If the petitioner pays only the bankruptcy fee without making an advance payment for bankruptcy costs or fails to provide receipts (or other evidence) for both payments, the Court shall return the petition to the petitioner. This is in accordance with the provisions of Point d, Clause 1, Article 35 of the Law on Bankruptcy.
Conclusion
In conclusion, refunding the advance payment for bankruptcy costs when a higher court annuls the ‘Decision to initiate bankruptcy proceedings’ highlights the legal system’s commitment to fairness and accountability. It ensures that individuals who have incurred costs do not bear an unfair burden due to a decision later overturned, thus promoting transparency and equity within bankruptcy proceedings.This topic sheds light on the complexities of the legal process and the measures in place to rectify potential injustices, ultimately upholding the integrity of the bankruptcy system.
About our company
HMLF is always available to offer assistance in understanding the procedures with authorities.
Head office: 14th floor, HM Town building, 412 Nguyen Thi Minh Khai, Ward 05, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City.
Phone number: +84 937215585
Website: hmlf.vn Email: miller@hmlf.vn
